This allows to link your profile to this item. If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.įor technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:spower:sp1916. You can help correct errors and omissions. Suggested CitationĪll material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. According to the author, an “antagonistic” post-capitalist society, in which there is a struggle for creative self-realization and the need for a “personalitysafeguarding” state, is much more preferable than an anarchic society that cultivates “personal equality”, which inevitably leads to the predominance of anonymity and impersonality. The state of the future could also protect the results of creative activity from theft and defamatory use protect an individual’s honor and dignity. It could: a) resolve social conflicts that arise between competing creative individuals b) to oversee creative activity, potentially carrying a threat to the humanity c) to ensure registration and merit control system operation, which would make it possible to identify the most worthy representatives of the society, forming political (cultural, social, aesthetic, etc.) agenda. However, according to the author, in this dynamic, the state could perform a number of socially significant functions. Accordingly, it is quite likely that the state, from the machine of oppression of one class by another, will turn into a “tool” (moral, cultural, political, etc.) of prominent creative personalities domination. The class struggle may be replaced by the struggle of individuals for creative self-realization, in which the overwhelming majority are destined to become losers. The author believes that in the proposed post-capitalist society the social antagonisms generating the need for the state will not necessarily disappear. The article disputes the thesis of the majority of modern left-wing theorists, according to which the state must “die off” sooner or later.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |